Journal Article2024Cited by 2

RACares: a conceptual design to guide mHealth relational agent development based on a systematic review

Ashraful Islam, Beenish Moalla Chaudhry, Aminul Islam

Mhealth

AME Publishing Company, Vol. 10, pp. 11-11, ISBN: 2306-9740

  • Good Health and Well-being — Relevance: 93%

Abstract

Background: A relational agent (RA) is a digital tool tailored to communicate with users, aiming to establish a sense of social ease and emotional bond, particularly focusing on their health and well-being concerns. A mobile health (mHealth) RA is particularly crafted to communicate with users within their mobile devices. As healthcare becomes increasingly digital, these mHealth RAs can serve as personal health assistants, e.g., guiding users through medical regimens, offering reminders for medication, providing emotional support during health crises, or even aiding in mental well-being exercises. Their accessibility, especially for those in remote areas, can bridge the gap between patients and immediate health assistance, revolutionizing the way healthcare is approached and delivered. Methods: In this paper, our primary focus is introducing a conceptual design for mHealth RAs with the aim of enhanced user engagement, personalized health interventions, consistent support, data collection and monitoring, and enhanced multimodal accessibility. To develop this conceptual design, we employed an inductive approach. This involved conducting a qualitative analysis on data gathered from a systematic literature review of RAs. Consequently, this analysis allowed us to identify a taxonomy of key design features essential for RAs. Results: This paper provides a conceptual design of mHealth RAs which includes five stages: user input receiving stage, input processing stage, data analysis stage, output processing stage, and output generation stage. A stage is a logical assembly of interconnected functionalities (components) that work together to accomplish a certain objective or set of goals. Each stage's outputs are used as inputs in the stages that follow after it. There is also a Data and Personalization Controller for aiding the data analysis stage. The stages are logically arranged one after another as follows: input, process, analysis, and output. Conclusions: The conceptual design aims to create RAs for various mHealth applications, including patient education, mental health counseling, and chronic disease management. This design is crucial in digital health research as it enhances patient-RA interactions, potentially improving health outcomes and experiences in non-life-threatening scenarios where RAs can be an alternative to human healthcare professionals (HCPs).

Keywords

  • chronic disease management
  • mental health counseling
  • multimodal accessibility
  • personalized health interventions
  • relational agents
  • Conceptual design
  • patient education
  • user engagement
  • medication reminders
  • remote healthcare access

CCDS Authors

Ashraful Islam, PhD
Ashraful Islam

Ashraful Islam, PhD

  • Center Director, CCDS
  • Director, HCI Wing

Assistant Professor

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Independent University, Bangladesh (IUB)

Published at

CHI, UIST, UbiComp, IJCNN, ICIP, HCII, ICDMW, BLP, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, JMIR, JMIR Human Factors, JMIR Formative Research, IEEE Access, Smart Agricultural Technology, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, PLOS ONE

Research Interests

Human-Computer Interaction, AI for Social Good, AI for Public Health, AI for Impact

Beenish Moalla Chaudhry, PhD
Beenish Moalla Chaudhry, PhD

Beenish Moalla Chaudhry, PhD

  • Collaborator, HCI Wing

Associate Professor

School of Computing and Informatics

University of Louisiana at Lafayette

Published at

UIST, HCII, JMIR Human Factors, JMIR Formative Research

References

  1. 1.Mary L. McHugh. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.. PubMed, 22(3), 276–82[link]
  2. 2.Nancy K. Janz, Marshall H. Becker. (1984). The Health Belief Model: A Decade Later. Health Education Quarterly, 11(1), 1–47[10.1177/109019818401100101]
  3. 3.Paul Ekman. (1993). Facial expression and emotion.. American Psychologist, 48(4), 384–392[10.1037//0003-066x.48.4.384]
  4. 4.Liliana Laranjo, Adam G. Dunn, Huong Ly Tong, A. Baki Kocaballı, Jessica Chen, Rabia Bashir, Didi Surian, Blanca Gallego, Farah Magrabi, Annie Lau, Enrico Coiera. (2018). Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 25(9), 1248–1258[10.1093/jamia/ocy072]
  5. 5.Caroline Free, Gemma Phillips, Louise Watson, Leandro Galli, Lambert Felix, Phil Edwards, Vikram Patel, Andy Haines. (2013). The Effectiveness of Mobile-Health Technologies to Improve Health Care Service Delivery Processes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS Medicine, 10(1), e1001363[10.1371/journal.pmed.1001363]
  6. 6.Aditya Vaidyam, Hannah Wisniewski, John Halamka, Matcheri S. Kashavan, John Torous. (2019). Chatbots and Conversational Agents in Mental Health: A Review of the Psychiatric Landscape. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(7), 456–464[10.1177/0706743719828977]
  7. 7.Michael Bošnjak, Icek Ajzen, Peter Schmidt. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Selected recent advances and applications. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 16(3), 352–356[10.5964/ejop.v16i3.3107]
  8. 8.Nour Mheidly, Jawad Fares. (2020). Leveraging media and health communication strategies to overcome the COVID-19 infodemic. Journal of Public Health Policy, 41(4), 410–420[10.1057/s41271-020-00247-w]
  9. 9.Timothy Bickmore, Amanda J. Gruber, Rosalind W. Picard. (2004). Establishing the computer–patient working alliance in automated health behavior change interventions. Patient Education and Counseling, 59(1), 21–30[10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.008]
  10. 10.Simon Provoost, Ho Ming Lau, Jeroen Ruwaard, Heleen Riper. (2017). Embodied Conversational Agents in Clinical Psychology: A Scoping Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(5), e151[10.2196/jmir.6553]
  11. 11.Karel Kreijns, Kate M. Xu, Joshua Weidlich. (2021). Social Presence: Conceptualization and Measurement. Educational Psychology Review, 34(1), 139–170[10.1007/s10648-021-09623-8]
  12. 12.Robert R. Morris, Kareem Kouddous, Rohan Kshirsagar, Stephen M. Schueller. (2018). Towards an Artificially Empathic Conversational Agent for Mental Health Applications: System Design and User Perceptions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(6), e10148[10.2196/10148]
  13. 13.Judith J. Prochaska, Erin A. Vogel, Amy Chieng, Matthew S. Kendra, Michael Baiocchi, Sarah Pajarito, Athena Robinson. (2021). A Therapeutic Relational Agent for Reducing Problematic Substance Use (Woebot): Development and Usability Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(3), e24850[10.2196/24850]
  14. 14.Timothy Bickmore, Daniel Schulman, Langxuan Yin. (2010). MAINTAINING ENGAGEMENT IN LONG-TERM INTERVENTIONS WITH RELATIONAL AGENTS. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 24(6), 648–666[10.1080/08839514.2010.492259]
  15. 15.Timothy Bickmore, Suzanne Mitchell, Brian W. Jack, Michael K. Paasche‐Orlow, Laura M. Pfeifer, Julie O’Donnell. (2009). Response to a relational agent by hospital patients with depressive symptoms. Interacting with Computers, 22(4), 289–298[10.1016/j.intcom.2009.12.001]
  16. 16.Judith J. Prochaska, Erin A. Vogel, Amy Chieng, Michael Baiocchi, Dale Dagar Maglalang, Sarah Pajarito, Kenneth R. Weingardt, Alison Darcy, Athena Robinson. (2021). A randomized controlled trial of a therapeutic relational agent for reducing substance misuse during the COVID-19 pandemic. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 227, 108986[10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108986]
  17. 17.João Balsa, Isa Brito Félix, Ana Paula Cláudio, Maria Beatriz Carmo, Isabel Costa e Silva, Ana M. G. Guerreiro, Maria João Guedes, Maria Adriana Henriques, Mara Pereira Guerreiro. (2020). Usability of an Intelligent Virtual Assistant for Promoting Behavior Change and Self-Care in Older People with Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Medical Systems, 44(7), 130[10.1007/s10916-020-01583-w]
  18. 18.Mark S. Dworkin, Sangyoon Lee, Apurba Chakraborty, Colleen Monahan, Lisa Hightow‐Weidman, Robert Garofalo, Dima M. Qato, Li Liu, Antonio D. Jimenez. (2019). Acceptability, Feasibility, and Preliminary Efficacy of a Theory-Based Relational Embodied Conversational Agent Mobile Phone Intervention to Promote HIV Medication Adherence in Young HIV-Positive African American MSM. AIDS Education and Prevention, 31(1), 17–37[10.1521/aeap.2019.31.1.17]
  19. 19.Nick Bott, Sharon Stahl Wexler, Lin J. Drury, Chava Pollak, Victor Wang, Kathleen Scher, Sharon Narducci. (2019). A Protocol-Driven, Bedside Digital Conversational Agent to Support Nurse Teams and Mitigate Risks of Hospitalization in Older Adults: Case Control Pre-Post Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e13440[10.2196/13440]
  20. 20.Emily Guhl, Andrew D. Althouse, Alexandra Pusateri, Everlyne Kimani, Michael K. Paasche‐Orlow, Timothy Bickmore, Jared W. Magnani. (2020). The Atrial Fibrillation Health Literacy Information Technology Trial: Pilot Trial of a Mobile Health App for Atrial Fibrillation. JMIR Cardio, 4(1), e17162[10.2196/17162]
  21. 21.Catharine Wang, Timothy Bickmore, Deborah J. Bowen, Tricia Norkunas, MaryAnn Campion, Howard Cabral, Michael Winter, Michael K. Paasche‐Orlow. (2015). Acceptability and feasibility of a virtual counselor (VICKY) to collect family health histories. Genetics in Medicine, 17(10), 822–830[10.1038/gim.2014.198]
  22. 22.Jared W. Magnani, Courtney Schlusser, Everlyne Kimani, Bruce L. Rollman, Michael K. Paasche‐Orlow, Timothy Bickmore. (2017). The Atrial Fibrillation Health Literacy Information Technology System: Pilot Assessment. JMIR Cardio, 1(2), e7[10.2196/cardio.8543]
  23. 23.Timothy Bickmore, Daniel Mauer, Thomas G. Brown. (2008). Context awareness in a handheld exercise agent. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 5(3), 226–235[10.1016/j.pmcj.2008.05.004]
  24. 24.Deborah Richards, Patrina Caldwell. (2017). Improving Health Outcomes Sooner Rather Than Later via an Interactive Website and Virtual Specialist. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 22(5), 1699–1706[10.1109/jbhi.2017.2782210]
  25. 25.Naomi Q. P. Tan, Hyunyi Cho. (2019). Cultural Appropriateness in Health Communication: A Review and A Revised Framework. Journal of Health Communication, 24(5), 492–502[10.1080/10810730.2019.1620382]
  26. 26.Isa Brito Félix, Mara Pereira Guerreiro, Afonso Cavaco, Ana Paula Cláudio, Anabela Mendes, João Balsa, Maria Beatriz Carmo, Nuno Pimenta, Maria Adriana Henriques. (2019). Development of a Complex Intervention to Improve Adherence to Antidiabetic Medication in Older People Using an Anthropomorphic Virtual Assistant Software. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 10, 680[10.3389/fphar.2019.00680]
  27. 27.Marianne Therese Smogeli Holter, Ayna B. Johansen, Håvar Brendryen. (2016). How a Fully Automated eHealth Program Simulates Three Therapeutic Processes: A Case Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(6), e176[10.2196/jmir.5415]
  28. 28.Amy Rubin, Nicholas A. Livingston, Julianne E. Brady, Elise Hocking, Timothy Bickmore, Molly Sawdy, Nancy R. Kressin, Richard Saitz, Steven R. Simon. (2021). Computerized Relational Agent to Deliver Alcohol Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment in Primary Care: a Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 37(1), 70–77[10.1007/s11606-021-06945-9]
  29. 29.Hannah Gaffney, Warren Mansell, Sara Tai. (2020). Agents of change: Understanding the therapeutic processes associated with the helpfulness of therapy for mental health problems with relational agent MYLO. Digital Health, 6, 2055207620911580[10.1177/2055207620911580]
  30. 30.Jared W. Magnani, Danielle Ferry, Gretchen Swabe, Deborah Martin, Xirun Chen, Maria M. Brooks, Everlyne Kimani, Michael K. Paasche‐Orlow, Stefán Ólafsson, Timothy Bickmore, Samar R. El Khoudary. (2022). Design and rationale of the mobile health intervention for rural atrial fibrillation. American Heart Journal, 252, 16–25[10.1016/j.ahj.2022.05.023]
  31. 31.Debbe Thompson, Chishinga Callender, Caroline Gonynor, Karen Cullen, María J. Redondo, Ashley M. Butler, Barbara J. Anderson. (2019). Using Relational Agents to Promote Family Communication Around Type 1 Diabetes Self-Management in the Diabetes Family Teamwork Online Intervention: Longitudinal Pilot Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(9), e15318[10.2196/15318]
  32. 32.Md Faisal Kabir, Daniel Schulman, Abu S. Abdullah. (2019). Promoting Relational Agent for Health Behavior Change in Low and Middle - Income Countries (LMICs): Issues and Approaches. Journal of Medical Systems, 43(7), 227[10.1007/s10916-019-1360-z]
  33. 33.Beenish Moalla Chaudhry, Ashraful Islam. (2022). A Mobile Application-Based Relational Agent as a Health Professional for COVID-19 Patients: Design, Approach, and Implications. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 13794[10.3390/ijerph192113794]
  34. 34.Kathryn Puskar, Elizabeth A. Schlenk, Judith A. Callan, Timothy Bickmore, Susan M. Sereika. (2011). Relational Agents as an Adjunct in Schizophrenia Treatment. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 49(8), 22–29[10.3928/02793695-20110705-01]

Cited By

  1. 1.Roison Andro Narvaez, Marilane Ferrer, Ralph Antonio Peco. (2026). Algorithmic Compassion in Holistic Nursing: A Concept Analysis and Conceptual Model. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 8980101261487731[10.1177/08980101261487731]
  2. 2.Izabela Souza Da Silva, Maria Goretti Fernandes. (2026). INTELIGÊNCIA ARTIFICIAL CONVERSACIONAL EM SAÚDE MENTAL: LACUNAS CONCEITUAIS E REQUISITOS PARA UM FRAMEWORK INTEGRATIVO. Revista de Geopolítica, 17(8), e3034[10.56238/revgeov17n8-023]